Shiro Miso vs Misopaste hell
Overall, Misopaste hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Shiro Miso | Misopaste hell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 23.4 g | 12.5 g |
| Salt | 4.7 g | 10.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 11.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Misopaste hell has 11% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Shiro Miso has 14% less fat (4.8 g vs 5.6 g).
- Misopaste hell has 47% less sugar (12.5 g vs 23.4 g).
- Shiro Miso has 54% less salt (4.7 g vs 10.2 g).
- Misopaste hell has 32% more protein (11.2 g vs 7.6 g).
Ingredients
Shiro Miso
Reis* (42%), Wasser, Sojabohnen* (21%), Meersalz, Aspergillus oryzae *aus ökologischem Landbau
Misopaste hell
Wasser, 30% _Sojabohnen_, Reis, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Shiro Miso or Misopaste hell?
Overall, Misopaste hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Misopaste hell has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Misopaste hell has less sugar: 12.5 g versus 23.4 g per 100 g.