Comparison

Semmel Knödel vs Delikatesse Mayonaise

Overall, Semmel Knödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSemmel KnödelDelikatesse Mayonaise
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 135 kcal 715 kcal
Fat 3.2 g 77.7 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 6.1 g
Sugars 1.5 g 2.4 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 3.8 g 0.9 g
Additives12
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Semmel Knödel has 81% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 715 kcal).
  • Semmel Knödel has 96% less fat (3.2 g vs 77.7 g).
  • Semmel Knödel has 93% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Semmel Knödel has 38% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Semmel Knödel has 76% more protein (3.8 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Semmel Knödel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Delikatesse Mayonaise is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Semmel Knödel lists: Gluten, Milk.
  • Only Delikatesse Mayonaise lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Semmel Knödel

FEIN GEWÜRZT 81% Semmelbrot (Weizenmehl, Speisesalz, Hefe), Palmfett, Weizengriess, Volleipulver, Zwiebelpulver, Speisesalz, Magermilchpulver, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl; Kräuter, Gewürze. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Sellerie enthalten.

Delikatesse Mayonaise

80% Rapsöl, 6% Eigelb, Branntweinessig, Zucker, Senf (Wasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Gewürze), Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure: Antioxidationsmittel: E 385

FAQ

Which is healthier: Semmel Knödel or Delikatesse Mayonaise?

Overall, Semmel Knödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Semmel Knödel has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 715 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Semmel Knödel has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons