Comparison

Sel et minéraux marins vs Paté de Atún

Overall, Sel et minéraux marins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSel et minéraux marinsPaté de Atún
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 0 kcal 216 kcal
Fat 0 g 17.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 49 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 9.6 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedFish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sel et minéraux marins has no calories, while Paté de Atún has 216 kcal.
  • Sel et minéraux marins has no fat, while Paté de Atún has 17.1 g.
  • Sel et minéraux marins has no saturated fat, while Paté de Atún has 2 g.
  • Sel et minéraux marins has no sugar, while Paté de Atún has 0.7 g.
  • Paté de Atún has 98% less salt (1 g vs 49 g).
  • Paté de Atún has 100% more protein (9.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Paté de Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sel et minéraux marins is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Paté de Atún lists: Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sel et minéraux marins

Sel de mer 70% et minéraux de mer 29%,(potassium, magnésium, calcium), carbonates de magnésium, E535

Paté de Atún

Atún (lomos) 46 %, agua, aceite de girasol, fibra vegetal, sal, aromas (contiene pescado), azúcar, estabilizante (E-407a), almidón, vinagre de vino (contiene sulfitos), proteína de soja y colorante (E-160c)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sel et minéraux marins or Paté de Atún?

Overall, Sel et minéraux marins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sel et minéraux marins has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sel et minéraux marins has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons