Martinel Pate vs Paté de Atún
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Martinel Pate | Paté de Atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 319 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.8 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de Atún has 32% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 319 kcal).
- Paté de Atún has 43% less fat (17.1 g vs 30 g).
- Paté de Atún has 84% less saturated fat (2 g vs 12.8 g).
- Paté de Atún has 45% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Martinel Pate has 13% more protein (11 g vs 9.6 g).
- Paté de Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Martinel Pate lists: Mustard.
- Only Paté de Atún lists: Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Martinel Pate
36% carne de porc, 22% carne de curcan, apă, slănină, 9% ficat de porc, emulgatori: esteri ai acizilor mono - şi diacetiltartic cu mono - şi digliceridele acizilor graşi, sare, dextroză, condimente (muştar), antioxidant: acid ascorbic, conservant: nitrit de sodiu.
Paté de Atún
Atún (lomos) 46 %, agua, aceite de girasol, fibra vegetal, sal, aromas (contiene pescado), azúcar, estabilizante (E-407a), almidón, vinagre de vino (contiene sulfitos), proteína de soja y colorante (E-160c)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Martinel Pate or Paté de Atún?
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de Atún has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Martinel Pate has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.