Pašteda kokošja vs Martinel Pate
Overall, Pašteda kokošja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pašteda kokošja | Martinel Pate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 319 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 12.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Mleka | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pašteda kokošja has 72% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 12.8 g).
- Pašteda kokošja has 27% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pašteda kokošja has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pašteda kokošja lists: Milk, Soybeans, Mleka.
- Only Martinel Pate lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pašteda kokošja
voda, meso 29%, biljno ulje (suncokretovo, repičino i sojino u promjenljivom odnosu), mliječne bjelančevina 3%, kokoša mast, koncentrirana kokošja supa, sojino brašno, kuhinjska so, začini i aromatično bilje, ekstrakt kvasca, ekstrakt paprike.
Martinel Pate
36% carne de porc, 22% carne de curcan, apă, slănină, 9% ficat de porc, emulgatori: esteri ai acizilor mono - şi diacetiltartic cu mono - şi digliceridele acizilor graşi, sare, dextroză, condimente (muştar), antioxidant: acid ascorbic, conservant: nitrit de sodiu.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pašteda kokošja or Martinel Pate?
Overall, Pašteda kokošja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pašteda kokošja has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pašteda kokošja has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.