Pašteda kokošja vs Paté de Atún
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pašteda kokošja | Paté de Atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Mleka | Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de Atún has 30% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 309 kcal).
- Paté de Atún has 41% less fat (17.1 g vs 29 g).
- Paté de Atún has 44% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Paté de Atún has 25% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Paté de Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pašteda kokošja lists: Milk, Mleka.
- Only Paté de Atún lists: Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pašteda kokošja
voda, meso 29%, biljno ulje (suncokretovo, repičino i sojino u promjenljivom odnosu), mliječne bjelančevina 3%, kokoša mast, koncentrirana kokošja supa, sojino brašno, kuhinjska so, začini i aromatično bilje, ekstrakt kvasca, ekstrakt paprike.
Paté de Atún
Atún (lomos) 46 %, agua, aceite de girasol, fibra vegetal, sal, aromas (contiene pescado), azúcar, estabilizante (E-407a), almidón, vinagre de vino (contiene sulfitos), proteína de soja y colorante (E-160c)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pašteda kokošja or Paté de Atún?
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de Atún has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pašteda kokošja has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.