Pate country style vs Paté de Atún
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate country style | Paté de Atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 19.5 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de Atún has 12% less fat (17.1 g vs 19.5 g).
- Paté de Atún has 71% less saturated fat (2 g vs 7 g).
- Paté de Atún has 42% less salt (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Paté de Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pate country style lists: Milk.
- Only Paté de Atún lists: Fish, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pate country style
47% ficat de porc, supă din carne de porc (apă, carme de porc), grăsime de porc, amidon din tapioca și din cartofi, sare, lapte praf, zahăr, ceapă, usturoi, măghiran, piper negru, ienibahar, ghimbir, stabilizatori: trifosfați, polifosfați, antioxidant: ascorbat de sodiu, conservant: nitrit de sodiu.
Paté de Atún
Atún (lomos) 46 %, agua, aceite de girasol, fibra vegetal, sal, aromas (contiene pescado), azúcar, estabilizante (E-407a), almidón, vinagre de vino (contiene sulfitos), proteína de soja y colorante (E-160c)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate country style or Paté de Atún?
Overall, Paté de Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de Atún has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 232 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate country style has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.