Pate country style vs Martinel Pate
Overall, Pate country style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate country style | Martinel Pate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 319 kcal |
| Fat | 19.5 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 12.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate country style has 27% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 319 kcal).
- Pate country style has 35% less fat (19.5 g vs 30 g).
- Pate country style has 45% less saturated fat (7 g vs 12.8 g).
- Pate country style has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pate country style lists: Milk.
- Only Martinel Pate lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pate country style
47% ficat de porc, supă din carne de porc (apă, carme de porc), grăsime de porc, amidon din tapioca și din cartofi, sare, lapte praf, zahăr, ceapă, usturoi, măghiran, piper negru, ienibahar, ghimbir, stabilizatori: trifosfați, polifosfați, antioxidant: ascorbat de sodiu, conservant: nitrit de sodiu.
Martinel Pate
36% carne de porc, 22% carne de curcan, apă, slănină, 9% ficat de porc, emulgatori: esteri ai acizilor mono - şi diacetiltartic cu mono - şi digliceridele acizilor graşi, sare, dextroză, condimente (muştar), antioxidant: acid ascorbic, conservant: nitrit de sodiu.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate country style or Martinel Pate?
Overall, Pate country style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate country style has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate country style has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.