Seendamer vs Gouda jung in Scheiben
Overall, Gouda jung in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Seendamer | Gouda jung in Scheiben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 27.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 22.8 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda jung in Scheiben has 12% fewer calories (341 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Gouda jung in Scheiben has 15% less fat (27.9 g vs 33 g).
- Gouda jung in Scheiben has 15% less saturated fat (19.3 g vs 22.8 g).
- Seendamer has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Gouda jung in Scheiben is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Seendamer
Käsereimilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Farbstoff (Carotin).
Gouda jung in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte MILCH, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten MILCH), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Seendamer or Gouda jung in Scheiben?
Overall, Gouda jung in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.