Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler vs Gouda jung in Scheiben
Overall, Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler
Gouda jung in Scheiben
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tils... | Gouda jung in Scheiben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 311 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 27.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has 18% less fat (23 g vs 27.9 g).
- Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has 22% less saturated fat (15 g vs 19.3 g).
- Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has 11% more protein (26 g vs 23.1 g).
Ingredients
Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler
Pasteurisierte Milch, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
Gouda jung in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte MILCH, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten MILCH), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler or Gouda jung in Scheiben?
Overall, Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Käse-Aufschnitt Edamer, Tilsiter, Emmentaler has fewer calories: 311 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.