Schweineschmalz vs Grammel Schmalz
Overall, Grammel Schmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schweineschmalz | Grammel Schmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 897 kcal | 853 kcal |
| Fat | 92 g | 95 g |
| Saturated fat | 92 g | 39 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grammel Schmalz has 58% less saturated fat (39 g vs 92 g).
- Schweineschmalz has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.5 g).
- Grammel Schmalz has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Grammel Schmalz has 79% more protein (2.4 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Schweineschmalz
Schweineschmalz, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin.
Grammel Schmalz
Grammelschmalzzubereitung Zutaten: Schweineschmalz 83%, Grammeln 13%, Knoblauchpaste Knoblauch, Salz), Speisesalz, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schweineschmalz or Grammel Schmalz?
Overall, Grammel Schmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grammel Schmalz has fewer calories: 853 kcal versus 897 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schweineschmalz has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.