Comparison

Schwarze Olivencreme vs Sugo fresco carciofi

Overall, Sugo fresco carciofi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchwarze OlivencremeSugo fresco carciofi
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 253 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 25 g 11 g
Saturated fat 3.7 g 2.2 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 1 g 2.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 49% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 253 kcal).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 56% less fat (11 g vs 25 g).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 41% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 87% less salt (0.7 g vs 5 g).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has 55% more protein (2.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Sugo fresco carciofi has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Schwarze Olivencreme is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sugo fresco carciofi lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Schwarze Olivencreme

Oliven', Balsamicoessig', natives Olivenöl extra', Oregano, Bohnenkraut. ¹aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.

Sugo fresco carciofi

Carciofi 34%, topinambur, acqua, oilo extra vergine di oliva, FORMAGGIO grattugiato, olio di girasole, spinaci, amidi, fibre vegetali (mais e patata), prezzemolo, aromi naturali (contengono FRUMENTO), sale

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schwarze Olivencreme or Sugo fresco carciofi?

Overall, Sugo fresco carciofi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo fresco carciofi has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 253 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo fresco carciofi has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons