Lilek v omáčce adžika vs Sugo fresco carciofi
Overall, Lilek v omáčce adžika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lilek v omáčce adžika | Sugo fresco carciofi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lilek v omáčce adžika has 38% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 130 kcal).
- Lilek v omáčce adžika has 55% less fat (5 g vs 11 g).
- Lilek v omáčce adžika has 73% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Sugo fresco carciofi has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6 g).
- Sugo fresco carciofi has 64% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Sugo fresco carciofi has 45% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Lilek v omáčce adžika is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sugo fresco carciofi lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Lilek v omáčce adžika
Lilek, paprika, rajčata, slunečnicový olej, cukr, jedlá sůl, česnek,regulátor kyselosti. kyselina octová, mletá červená paprika.
Sugo fresco carciofi
Carciofi 34%, topinambur, acqua, oilo extra vergine di oliva, FORMAGGIO grattugiato, olio di girasole, spinaci, amidi, fibre vegetali (mais e patata), prezzemolo, aromi naturali (contengono FRUMENTO), sale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lilek v omáčce adžika or Sugo fresco carciofi?
Overall, Lilek v omáčce adžika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lilek v omáčce adžika has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo fresco carciofi has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6 g per 100 g.