Schmand-alternative vs Haver Fraîche
Overall, Haver Fraîche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand-alternative | Haver Fraîche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haver Fraîche has 17% less fat (15 g vs 18 g).
- Haver Fraîche has 31% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8.7 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 33% more protein (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Haver Fraîche has the better Nutri-Score.
- Haver Fraîche is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Schmand-alternative
Wasser, 17,5% pflanzliche Öle (9% Raps, 8,5% Kokos), Ackerbohnenprotein, Maltodextrin, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl; Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren; Säuerungskulturen. Kann Spuren von MILCH enthalten.
Haver Fraîche
Water, plantaardige olie (raap, 9 kokos), 8% haver, aardappeleiwit, aardappel - 84 zetmeel, gemodificeerd gerstzetmeel, cultuur, zuurteregelaar (E296, E270), zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand-alternative or Haver Fraîche?
Overall, Haver Fraîche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmand-alternative has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand-alternative has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.