Schmand-alternative vs Creamo 18%
Overall, Schmand-alternative has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand-alternative | Creamo 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmand-alternative has 46% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 16 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 40% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Schmand-alternative
Wasser, 17,5% pflanzliche Öle (9% Raps, 8,5% Kokos), Ackerbohnenprotein, Maltodextrin, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl; Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren; Säuerungskulturen. Kann Spuren von MILCH enthalten.
Creamo 18%
Ekstrakt z miąższu kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand-alternative or Creamo 18%?
Overall, Schmand-alternative has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmand-alternative has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 183 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand-alternative has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.