Creme vega vs Schmand-alternative
Overall, Schmand-alternative has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Creme vega | Schmand-alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 287 kcal | 181 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 27 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmand-alternative has 37% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 287 kcal).
- Schmand-alternative has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 68% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 27 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Creme vega has 38% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Creme vega
Not available.
Schmand-alternative
Wasser, 17,5% pflanzliche Öle (9% Raps, 8,5% Kokos), Ackerbohnenprotein, Maltodextrin, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl; Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren; Säuerungskulturen. Kann Spuren von MILCH enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Creme vega or Schmand-alternative?
Overall, Schmand-alternative has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmand-alternative has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand-alternative has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.