Creme vega vs Kaurakevi
Overall, Kaurakevi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Creme vega | Kaurakevi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 287 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 27 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaurakevi has 54% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 287 kcal).
- Kaurakevi has 67% less fat (10 g vs 30 g).
- Kaurakevi has 85% less saturated fat (4 g vs 27 g).
- Kaurakevi has 50% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- Creme vega has 67% more protein (2.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kaurakevi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Creme vega
Not available.
Kaurakevi
Hapatettu kaurapohja (vesi, gluteeniton kaura 8% (Suomi), hapate), rapsiöljy, perunatärkkelys, kokonaan kovetettu kookosöljy, muunnettu tärkkelys, perunaproteiini, suola, happo (omenahappo)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Creme vega or Kaurakevi?
Overall, Kaurakevi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaurakevi has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaurakevi has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.