Schmand-alternative vs Kaurakevi
Overall, Kaurakevi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand-alternative | Kaurakevi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaurakevi has 27% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 181 kcal).
- Kaurakevi has 44% less fat (10 g vs 18 g).
- Kaurakevi has 54% less saturated fat (4 g vs 8.7 g).
- Schmand-alternative has 47% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kaurakevi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schmand-alternative
Wasser, 17,5% pflanzliche Öle (9% Raps, 8,5% Kokos), Ackerbohnenprotein, Maltodextrin, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl; Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren; Säuerungskulturen. Kann Spuren von MILCH enthalten.
Kaurakevi
Hapatettu kaurapohja (vesi, gluteeniton kaura 8% (Suomi), hapate), rapsiöljy, perunatärkkelys, kokonaan kovetettu kookosöljy, muunnettu tärkkelys, perunaproteiini, suola, happo (omenahappo)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand-alternative or Kaurakevi?
Overall, Kaurakevi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaurakevi has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand-alternative has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.