Comparison

Saumon rose vs Pastella - pasta z łososia

Overall, Saumon rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaumon rosePastella - pasta z łososia
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 130 kcal 518 kcal
Fat 5 g 52.4 g
Saturated fat 1 g 4.2 g
Sugars 0 g 6.4 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 21 g 4.5 g
Additives07
AllergensFishCelery, Eggs, Fish, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saumon rose has 75% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 518 kcal).
  • Saumon rose has 90% less fat (5 g vs 52.4 g).
  • Saumon rose has 76% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Saumon rose has no sugar, while Pastella - pasta z łososia has 6.4 g.
  • Saumon rose has 53% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Saumon rose has 79% more protein (21 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Saumon rose has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Saumon rose is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pastella - pasta z łososia lists: Celery, Eggs, Mustard.

Ingredients

Saumon rose

Saumon Sauvage (99,4%), sel

Pastella - pasta z łososia

rapeseed oil, 23.5% smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), water, sugar, salt, ground mustard, spirit vinegar, turmeric, egg yolk, vegetable seasoning (contains celery), 0.16% chives, acidity regulators (lactic acid, citric acid), thickeners (guar gum, xanthan gum), preservatives (potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate), paprika extract. May contain: crustaceans, soy, milk, and gluten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saumon rose or Pastella - pasta z łososia?

Overall, Saumon rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saumon rose has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 518 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon rose has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons