Comparison

Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers vs Saumon rose

Overall, Saumon rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes de Saumon rose du...Saumon rose
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 229 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 20 g 5 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Fish, MilkFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saumon rose has 43% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 229 kcal).
  • Saumon rose has 75% less fat (5 g vs 20 g).
  • Saumon rose has 41% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Saumon rose has no sugar, while Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers has 0.5 g.
  • Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Saumon rose has 43% more protein (21 g vs 12 g).
  • Saumon rose has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Saumon rose is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers lists: Eggs, Milk.

Ingredients

Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers

Saumon rose du Pacifique 52 %, eau, huile de colza, blanc d'œuf en poudre, protéines de lait, sel de Guérande 1%, purée de tmates double concentrée, jus de citron à base de concentré, fécule de pomme de terre, arôme de fumée.

Saumon rose

Saumon Sauvage (99,4%), sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes de Saumon rose du Pacifique Ronde des Mers or Saumon rose?

Overall, Saumon rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saumon rose has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 229 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon rose has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons