Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil vs Filet de cabillaud panure bio
Overall, Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil
Filet de cabillaud panure bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon pané panure croustill... | Filet de cabillaud panure bi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 199 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 8.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de cabillaud panure bio has 26% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 268 kcal).
- Filet de cabillaud panure bio has 45% less fat (8.8 g vs 16 g).
- Filet de cabillaud panure bio has 55% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil
Saumon atlantique ASC 70% (Salmo salar élevé en Norvège) qualité sans arête*, farine de blé (gluten), huile de tournesol, amidon de blé (gluten), sel, arôme naturel de citron 0,14%, persil 0,1%, levure. Produit élaboré dans un atelier qui utilise : œuf. * Malgré tout le soin apporté à la préparation de nos poissons qualité sans arête, la présence exceptionnelle d'arête n'est jamais exclue.
Filet de cabillaud panure bio
Cabillaud MSC (POISSON) 72%, chapelure* (farine de BLE*, levure*, sel), huile de tournesol*, eau, farine de BLE*, poudre de citron* (dextrose*, huile de citron*), sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil or Filet de cabillaud panure bio?
Overall, Filet de cabillaud panure bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de cabillaud panure bio has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon pané panure croustillante aromatisée au citron et persil has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.