Saucisse de Lyon fine Alsacienne vs Saucisse de Lyon de volaille
Overall, Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Saucisse de Lyon fine Alsacienne
Saucisse de Lyon de volaille
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse de Lyon fine Alsaci... | Saucisse de Lyon de volaille |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 252 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 22.7 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.8 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 8 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has 20% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has 30% less fat (16 g vs 22.7 g).
- Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has 43% less saturated fat (5 g vs 8.8 g).
- Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saucisse de Lyon fine Alsacienne
Viande de porc 60 %, eau, gras de porc, sel, plasma de porc, dextrose, épices et aromates, stabilisants : E450, E451, E452, arômes, antioxydants : acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, acidifiant : E575, exhausteur de goût : glutamate monosodique, conservateur : E250.
Saucisse de Lyon de volaille
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse de Lyon fine Alsacienne or Saucisse de Lyon de volaille?
Overall, Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de Lyon de volaille has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.