Comparison

Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette vs Sugo con peperoncino

Overall, Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce tomate de marmande au...Sugo con peperoncino
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 42 kcal 52 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.3 g 4.2 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0 g
Protein 1.1 g 1.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has 19% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 52 kcal).
  • Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Sugo con peperoncino has 27% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Sugo con peperoncino has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette

Not available.

Sugo con peperoncino

Tomato pulp 60%, tomato purée 20%, tomato paste 7.5%, red peppers, olive oil, onion, parsley, chilli pepper 0.5%, basil, salt, natural flavourings, garlic, chilli pepper extract. May contain milk and tree nuts.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette or Sugo con peperoncino?

Overall, Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauce tomate de marmande au piment d'espelette has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo con peperoncino has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons