Comparison

Salsa Dip Mild vs Sugo con peperoncino

Overall, Salsa Dip Mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalsa Dip MildSugo con peperoncino
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 39 kcal 52 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.1 g 4.2 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2.8 g 0 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.5 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salsa Dip Mild has 25% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 52 kcal).
  • Salsa Dip Mild has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Salsa Dip Mild has no saturated fat, while Sugo con peperoncino has 0.4 g.
  • Sugo con peperoncino has 30% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Salsa Dip Mild has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Sugo con peperoncino has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salsa Dip Mild

Tomates en morceaux 53%, eau, oignons 10%, concentré de tomates 10%, poivrons vert 7%, sel, vinaigre, copeaux d'oignons, épices, oignons en poudre, piment chilli 0.5%, sucre, jus de citron concentré, épaississant: gomme xanthane E415, ail en poudre, correcteur d'acidité E330, affermissant: chlorure de calcium E509, origan, extrait de paprika.

Sugo con peperoncino

Tomato pulp 60%, tomato purée 20%, tomato paste 7.5%, red peppers, olive oil, onion, parsley, chilli pepper 0.5%, basil, salt, natural flavourings, garlic, chilli pepper extract. May contain milk and tree nuts.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salsa Dip Mild or Sugo con peperoncino?

Overall, Salsa Dip Mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa Dip Mild has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsa Dip Mild has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons