Comparison

Sambal Oelek vs Sambal brandal

Overall, Sambal Oelek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSambal OelekSambal brandal
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 69 kcal 177 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 5.6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 2.1 g
Sugars 11 g 18 g
Salt 3.6 g 8.7 g
Fiber 1.2 g 2.4 g
Protein 1.1 g 1.8 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedCrustaceans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sambal Oelek has 61% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 177 kcal).
  • Sambal Oelek has 84% less fat (0.9 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 92% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 39% less sugar (11 g vs 18 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 59% less salt (3.6 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Sambal brandal has 52% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sambal brandal has 39% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sambal brandal lists: Crustaceans.

Ingredients

Sambal Oelek

Roter Chili (70 %), Branntweinessig", Meersalz, Rohrohrzucker, Zitronensaftkonzentrat", Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl

Sambal brandal

Sambal Oelek 54% (chilipeper¹ 89%, zout, voedingszuur E270, conserveermiddel E202), bruine suiker (suiker, melasse, kleurstof E150c) melasse, water, ui 6,9%, plantaardige olie (zonnebloem, palm, raapzaad), zout, azijn, maltodextrine, galangawortel, GARNALENPOEDER, Kaffir limoenblad, aroma, conserveermiddel E202,¹ op duurzame wijze geteeld,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sambal Oelek or Sambal brandal?

Overall, Sambal Oelek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sambal Oelek has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sambal Oelek has less sugar: 11 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons