Comparison

Sambal brandal vs Sambal Oelek

Overall, Sambal Oelek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSambal brandalSambal Oelek
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 177 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 2 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 18 g 2.5 g
Salt 8.7 g 9.8 g
Fiber 2.4 g 6 g
Protein 1.8 g 2.5 g
Additives22
AllergensCrustaceansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sambal Oelek has 72% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 177 kcal).
  • Sambal Oelek has 64% less fat (2 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 71% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 86% less sugar (2.5 g vs 18 g).
  • Sambal brandal has 11% less salt (8.7 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 60% more fiber (6 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has 28% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Sambal Oelek has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sambal Oelek is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sambal brandal lists: Crustaceans.

Ingredients

Sambal brandal

Sambal Oelek 54% (chilipeper¹ 89%, zout, voedingszuur E270, conserveermiddel E202), bruine suiker (suiker, melasse, kleurstof E150c) melasse, water, ui 6,9%, plantaardige olie (zonnebloem, palm, raapzaad), zout, azijn, maltodextrine, galangawortel, GARNALENPOEDER, Kaffir limoenblad, aroma, conserveermiddel E202,¹ op duurzame wijze geteeld,

Sambal Oelek

88% chilipeper, zout, voedingszuur (azijnzuur [E260]), conserveermiddel (kaliumsorbaat [E202])

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sambal brandal or Sambal Oelek?

Overall, Sambal Oelek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sambal Oelek has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sambal Oelek has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons