Comparison

Salmon fillet with skin vs Wildlachsfilet

Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Salmon fillet with skin

Salmon fillet with skin

Gastronomia di mare · 500g
a NOVA 1
Better choice
Wildlachsfilet

Wildlachsfilet

Golden Seafood · 250g
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalmon fillet with skinWildlachsfilet
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 204 kcal 95 kcal
Fat 12.8 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22.2 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wildlachsfilet has 53% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 204 kcal).
  • Wildlachsfilet has 87% less fat (1.7 g vs 12.8 g).
  • Wildlachsfilet has 75% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Only Salmon fillet with skin lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Salmon fillet with skin

Fileti atlantskog lososa s kožom.

Wildlachsfilet

Wildlachsfilet

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salmon fillet with skin or Wildlachsfilet?

Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wildlachsfilet has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salmon fillet with skin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Salmon fillet with skin vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet... Wildlachsfilet vs Poke salmón Filet de saumon vs Wildlachsfilet Salmon fillet with skin vs Saumon ASC Saumon ASC vs Wildlachsfilet Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs Salmon fillet with skin Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs Wildlachsfilet Salmon fillet with skin vs Purée de pommes de terre...