Salim vs Raibi
Overall, Salim has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salim | Raibi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 57 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 10.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raibi has 80% less fat (0.6 g vs 3 g).
- Raibi has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Salim has 54% less sugar (4.8 g vs 10.5 g).
- Salim has 53% more protein (3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Salim has the better Nutri-Score.
- Salim is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Raibi lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Salim
gluten free
Raibi
Lait écrémé, lait entier, sucre, lait en poudre, amidon modifié, lactosérum en poudre, arôme de grenade, levures lactiques, teneur en matières grasses 0,5 %, produit sur une ligne pouvant contenir des traces de gluten et de crustacés.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salim or Raibi?
Overall, Salim has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raibi has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salim has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 10.5 g per 100 g.