Comparison
Salim vs Latte parzialmente scremato
Overall, Latte parzialmente scremato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salim | Latte parzialmente scremato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Latte parzialmente scremato has 19% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Latte parzialmente scremato has 48% less fat (1.6 g vs 3 g).
- Latte parzialmente scremato has 40% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Latte parzialmente scremato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Latte parzialmente scremato lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Salim
gluten free
Latte parzialmente scremato
Latte parzialmente scremato,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salim or Latte parzialmente scremato?
Overall, Latte parzialmente scremato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Latte parzialmente scremato has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salim has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.