Comparison
Jibal vs Latte parzialmente scremato
Overall, Jibal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jibal | Latte parzialmente scremato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jibal has 21% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Jibal has 87% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Jibal has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Jibal
Lait
Latte parzialmente scremato
Latte parzialmente scremato,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jibal or Latte parzialmente scremato?
Overall, Jibal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jibal has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Latte parzialmente scremato has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.