Comparison
Jibal vs Soumam Fat Partly Removed
Overall, Jibal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jibal | Soumam Fat Partly Removed |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jibal has 16% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Jibal has 87% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Jibal has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Jibal has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Jibal
Lait
Soumam Fat Partly Removed
Eau, poudre de lait entier, poudre de lait écrémé.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jibal or Soumam Fat Partly Removed?
Overall, Jibal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jibal has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soumam Fat Partly Removed has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.