Salade de fruit vs Macedonia tradizionale
Overall, Macedonia tradizionale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade de fruit | Macedonia tradizionale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 9.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Kiwi |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade de fruit has 43% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Macedonia tradizionale has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Macedonia tradizionale lists: Kiwi.
Ingredients
Salade de fruit
Not available.
Macedonia tradizionale
Ananas, Mela,, Kiwi, Uva Antiossidante: Acido Ascorbico, ascorbato di calcio, ascorbato di sodio
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade de fruit or Macedonia tradizionale?
Overall, Macedonia tradizionale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade de fruit has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade de fruit has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.