Comparison

Salade de fruit vs Macedonia tradizionale

Overall, Salade de fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Salade de fruit	Macedonia tradizionale
Nutri-Score	—	a
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	46 kcal	60 kcal
Fat	0.4 g	0.2 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	6.7 g	9.7 g
Salt	—	0 g
Fiber	1.8 g	2 g
Protein	0.8 g	0.5 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Kiwi

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Salade de fruit has 23% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 60 kcal).
Salade de fruit has 31% less sugar (6.7 g vs 9.7 g).
Salade de fruit has 39% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
Only Macedonia tradizionale lists: Kiwi.

Ingredients

Salade de fruit

Not available.

Macedonia tradizionale

Ananas, Mela,, Kiwi, Uva Antiossidante: Acido Ascorbico, ascorbato di calcio, ascorbato di sodio

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade de fruit or Macedonia tradizionale?

Overall, Salade de fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade de fruit has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de fruit has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Frischer Fruchtsalat vs Macedonia tradizionale Fruit Salad vs Macedonia tradizionale Ananas Fraises Myrtilles vs Macedonia tradizionale Salade de fruits vs Macedonia tradizionale Fruits vs Macedonia tradizionale Salade de fruit vs Frischer Fruchtsalat Fruit Salad vs Salade de fruit Salade de fruit vs Ananas Fraises Myrtilles