Comparison

Salade de fruits vs Macedonia tradizionale

Overall, Salade de fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade de fruitsMacedonia tradizionale
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 47 kcal 60 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 6.8 g 9.7 g
Salt — 0 g
Fiber 1.8 g 2 g
Protein 0.8 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedKiwi

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade de fruits has 22% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 60 kcal).
  • Salade de fruits has 29% less sugar (6.8 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Only Macedonia tradizionale lists: Kiwi.

Ingredients

Salade de fruits

Not available.

Macedonia tradizionale

Ananas, Mela,, Kiwi, Uva Antiossidante: Acido Ascorbico, ascorbato di calcio, ascorbato di sodio

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade de fruits or Macedonia tradizionale?

Overall, Salade de fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade de fruits has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de fruits has less sugar: 6.8 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons