Comparison
Salada Iceberg vs Salada de Grão e Atum
Overall, Salada Iceberg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salada Iceberg | Salada de Grão e Atum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 140 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.7 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salada Iceberg has 89% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 140 kcal).
- Salada Iceberg has 98% less fat (0.2 g vs 8.6 g).
- Salada Iceberg has no saturated fat, while Salada de Grão e Atum has 1.6 g.
- Salada Iceberg has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Salada de Grão e Atum has 65% more fiber (3.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Salada de Grão e Atum has 74% more protein (6.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Salada Iceberg has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salada Iceberg
Not available.
Salada de Grão e Atum
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salada Iceberg or Salada de Grão e Atum?
Overall, Salada Iceberg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salada Iceberg has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 140 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salada de Grão e Atum has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.