Rustico trio mix vs Riso integrale venere
Overall, Riso integrale venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rustico trio mix | Riso integrale venere |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 310 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso integrale venere has 12% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 351 kcal).
- Rustico trio mix has 30% less fat (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Riso integrale venere has 60% more fiber (4.8 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Rustico trio mix
Riz long étuvé 70%, riz Venere complet étuvé 15%, riz long à grains rouge complet 15%
Riso integrale venere
MITTELKÖRNIGER SCHWARZER PARBOILED VENERE VOLLKORNREIS
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rustico trio mix or Riso integrale venere?
Overall, Riso integrale venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso integrale venere has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rustico trio mix has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.