Rundvlees bitterballen vs Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema
Overall, Rundvlees bitterballen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rundvlees bitterballen
Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rundvlees bitterballen | Chrupki kukurydziane w polew... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 557 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 34.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 33 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 45.8 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 4.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rundvlees bitterballen has 65% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 557 kcal).
- Rundvlees bitterballen has 76% less fat (8.3 g vs 34.8 g).
- Rundvlees bitterballen has 95% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 33 g).
- Rundvlees bitterballen has 98% less sugar (1.1 g vs 45.8 g).
- Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Rundvlees bitterballen has 41% more protein (7.8 g vs 4.6 g).
- Rundvlees bitterballen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rundvlees bitterballen
Not available.
Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rundvlees bitterballen or Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema?
Overall, Rundvlees bitterballen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rundvlees bitterballen has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rundvlees bitterballen has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 45.8 g per 100 g.