Comparison

Rundvlees bitterballen vs Zuivelspread Bieslook

Overall, Rundvlees bitterballen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRundvlees bitterballenZuivelspread Bieslook
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 197 kcal 178 kcal
Fat 8.3 g 14.2 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 9 g
Sugars 1.1 g 3.4 g
Salt 1 g 33.4 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0.4 g
Protein 7.8 g 7.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rundvlees bitterballen has 42% less fat (8.3 g vs 14.2 g).
  • Rundvlees bitterballen has 83% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Rundvlees bitterballen has 68% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Rundvlees bitterballen has 97% less salt (1 g vs 33.4 g).
  • Rundvlees bitterballen has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Zuivelspread Bieslook lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Rundvlees bitterballen

Not available.

Zuivelspread Bieslook

Gepasteuriseerde MELK, gepasteuriseerde room (MELK), yoghurt (MELK), uiengranulaat, zout, bieslook 0,4%, zuursel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rundvlees bitterballen or Zuivelspread Bieslook?

Overall, Rundvlees bitterballen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zuivelspread Bieslook has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rundvlees bitterballen has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons