Rough Oatcakes vs The ORIGINAL CRACKER
Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rough Oatcakes | The ORIGINAL CRACKER |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 445 kcal | 487 kcal |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 8.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rough Oatcakes has 24% less fat (17.5 g vs 23 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has 67% less saturated fat (2 g vs 6.1 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has 92% less sugar (0.7 g vs 8.5 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has no salt, while Rough Oatcakes has 1.5 g.
- Rough Oatcakes has 68% more fiber (10.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has 29% more protein (11 g vs 7.8 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rough Oatcakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rough Oatcakes
Wholegrain Oats (90%), Sunflower Oil, Sustainable Palm Fruit Oil, Sea Salt, Sodium Bicarbonate.
The ORIGINAL CRACKER
Wheat Flour, Palm Oil, Sugar, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Raising Agents (Calcium Phosphates, Ammonium Carbonates, Sodium Carbonates, Potassium Carbonates), Salt, Barley Malt Flour
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rough Oatcakes or The ORIGINAL CRACKER?
Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rough Oatcakes has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 487 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rough Oatcakes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.