Rough Oatcakes vs Tuc Original
Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rough Oatcakes | Tuc Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 445 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 10.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Eggs, Gluten, Metabisolfito |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rough Oatcakes has 32% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 9 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has 90% less sugar (0.7 g vs 7.1 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has 77% more fiber (10.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has 25% more protein (11 g vs 8.3 g).
- Rough Oatcakes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rough Oatcakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tuc Original lists: Eggs, Metabisolfito.
Ingredients
Rough Oatcakes
Wholegrain Oats (90%), Sunflower Oil, Sustainable Palm Fruit Oil, Sea Salt, Sodium Bicarbonate.
Tuc Original
wheat flour, palm oil, glucose syrup, barley malt extract, raising agents (ammonium carbonates, sodium carbonates), salt, eggs , flavouring, flour treatment agent (sodium metabisulfite ),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rough Oatcakes or Tuc Original?
Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rough Oatcakes has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rough Oatcakes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.