Tuc Original vs The ORIGINAL CRACKER
Overall, The ORIGINAL CRACKER has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuc Original | The ORIGINAL CRACKER |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 482 kcal | 487 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 8.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Metabisolfito | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuc Original has 17% less fat (19 g vs 23 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has 78% less saturated fat (2 g vs 9 g).
- Tuc Original has 16% less sugar (7.1 g vs 8.5 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has no salt, while Tuc Original has 1.7 g.
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has 27% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.4 g).
- The ORIGINAL CRACKER has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tuc Original lists: Eggs, Metabisolfito.
Ingredients
Tuc Original
wheat flour, palm oil, glucose syrup, barley malt extract, raising agents (ammonium carbonates, sodium carbonates), salt, eggs , flavouring, flour treatment agent (sodium metabisulfite ),
The ORIGINAL CRACKER
Wheat Flour, Palm Oil, Sugar, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Raising Agents (Calcium Phosphates, Ammonium Carbonates, Sodium Carbonates, Potassium Carbonates), Salt, Barley Malt Flour
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuc Original or The ORIGINAL CRACKER?
Overall, The ORIGINAL CRACKER has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuc Original has fewer calories: 482 kcal versus 487 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuc Original has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.