Comparison

Rough Oatcakes vs Monaco emmenthal

Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRough OatcakesMonaco emmenthal
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 445 kcal 553 kcal
Fat 17.5 g 36 g
Saturated fat 6.1 g 18 g
Sugars 0.7 g 5.6 g
Salt 1.5 g 2.1 g
Fiber 10.4 g 2.4 g
Protein 11 g 12 g
Additives24
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rough Oatcakes has 20% fewer calories (445 kcal vs 553 kcal).
  • Rough Oatcakes has 51% less fat (17.5 g vs 36 g).
  • Rough Oatcakes has 66% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 18 g).
  • Rough Oatcakes has 88% less sugar (0.7 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Rough Oatcakes has 30% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Rough Oatcakes has 77% more fiber (10.4 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Rough Oatcakes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Rough Oatcakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Monaco emmenthal lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Rough Oatcakes

Wholegrain Oats (90%), Sunflower Oil, Sustainable Palm Fruit Oil, Sea Salt, Sodium Bicarbonate.

Monaco emmenthal

Farine de BLE 56 %, huiles végétales (palme, colza), EMMENTAL râpé séché 17 %, sucre, sel, sirop de glucose-fructose, poudres à lever (carbonates d'ammonium, carbonates de sodium), farine d'ORGE malté, lactosérum en poudre (de LAIT), levure sèche, émulsifiant (lécithines de SOJA).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rough Oatcakes or Monaco emmenthal?

Overall, Rough Oatcakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rough Oatcakes has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rough Oatcakes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons