Comparison

Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) vs Toastschinken

Overall, Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Fil...Toastschinken
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 119 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 3 g 3 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 22 g 18 g
Additives33
AllergensMaïsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Toastschinken has 13% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 119 kcal).
  • Toastschinken has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has 18% more protein (22 g vs 18 g).
  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) lists: Maïs.

Ingredients

Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches)

Filet de porc, sel, bouillon (eau, ail, plantes aromatiques 0,1%), dextrose de maïs, poivre 0,1%, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, colorant, caramel

Toastschinken

Schweinefleisch 91 %, Trinkwasser, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit), Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Zucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) or Toastschinken?

Overall, Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Toastschinken has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Toastschinken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons