Roti de porc vs Toastschinken
Overall, Roti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roti de porc | Toastschinken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 51 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roti de porc has 50% fewer calories (51 kcal vs 103 kcal).
- Roti de porc has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Roti de porc has 55% less salt (0.9 g vs 2 g).
- Toastschinken has 94% more protein (18 g vs 1 g).
- Roti de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Roti de porc
Not available.
Toastschinken
Schweinefleisch 91 %, Trinkwasser, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit), Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Zucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roti de porc or Toastschinken?
Overall, Roti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roti de porc has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roti de porc has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.