Roti de porc aux herbes vs Toastschinken
Overall, Toastschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roti de porc aux herbes | Toastschinken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Toastschinken has 26% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 139 kcal).
- Toastschinken has 42% less fat (3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Toastschinken has 38% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Toastschinken has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Roti de porc aux herbes has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Roti de porc aux herbes has 18% more protein (22 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Roti de porc aux herbes
Not available.
Toastschinken
Schweinefleisch 91 %, Trinkwasser, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit), Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Zucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roti de porc aux herbes or Toastschinken?
Overall, Toastschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Toastschinken has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Toastschinken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.