Comparison

Rôti de dinde vs Fuetec Original

Overall, Rôti de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRôti de dindeFuetec Original
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 109 kcal 455 kcal
Fat 2 g 37 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 13 g
Sugars 0.7 g 2.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 4 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 22 g 27 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rôti de dinde has 76% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 455 kcal).
  • Rôti de dinde has 95% less fat (2 g vs 37 g).
  • Rôti de dinde has 94% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 13 g).
  • Rôti de dinde has 72% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Rôti de dinde has 45% less salt (2.2 g vs 4 g).
  • Fuetec Original has 19% more protein (27 g vs 22 g).
  • Rôti de dinde has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Fuetec Original lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Rôti de dinde

Filet de dinde (92%), Sel, Dextrose, Sucre, Epices, Arôme, Stabilisateur: E331; Épaississant: E407; Antioxygène: E301; Conservateur: E250.

Fuetec Original

Schweinefleisch, Schweinebauchspeck, LAKTOSE (Von Milch) Kochsalz, Gluckosesirup (Mais), Dextrose (Mais), Gewürze, Naturdarm vom Schwein. Für 100g Enderzeugnis wurden 160g Schweinefleisch benötigt. Kann Spuren von SOJA enthalten Produkt mit Metallendverschluss. Vor dem Verzehr entfernen. Abtrocknung, Trocken Gewichtsverlust durch ung bei Raumtemperatur lagern. Von Natur aus glutenfrei

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rôti de dinde or Fuetec Original?

Overall, Rôti de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rôti de dinde has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 455 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rôti de dinde has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons