Comparison

Lardons Fumés vs Fuetec Original

Overall, Lardons Fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLardons FumésFuetec Original
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 179 kcal 455 kcal
Fat 13.1 g 37 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 13 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 4 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 14.9 g 27 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lardons Fumés has 61% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 455 kcal).
  • Lardons Fumés has 65% less fat (13.1 g vs 37 g).
  • Lardons Fumés has 66% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 13 g).
  • Lardons Fumés has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Lardons Fumés has 31% less salt (2.8 g vs 4 g).
  • Fuetec Original has 45% more protein (27 g vs 14.9 g).
  • Only Fuetec Original lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Lardons Fumés

Cuisse de poulet halal (48%), cuisse de dinde halal (32%), eau, sel, sirop de glucose, fumée liquide, conservateurs (E252, E250), antioxydant (E316), Traces éventuelles de soja, produits laitiers, sulfites

Fuetec Original

Schweinefleisch, Schweinebauchspeck, LAKTOSE (Von Milch) Kochsalz, Gluckosesirup (Mais), Dextrose (Mais), Gewürze, Naturdarm vom Schwein. Für 100g Enderzeugnis wurden 160g Schweinefleisch benötigt. Kann Spuren von SOJA enthalten Produkt mit Metallendverschluss. Vor dem Verzehr entfernen. Abtrocknung, Trocken Gewichtsverlust durch ung bei Raumtemperatur lagern. Von Natur aus glutenfrei

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lardons Fumés or Fuetec Original?

Overall, Lardons Fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lardons Fumés has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 455 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lardons Fumés has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons