Rote Beete vs Rote Bete
Overall, Rote Beete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rote Beete | Rote Bete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 12.4 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Beete has 17% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 64 kcal).
- Rote Bete has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rote Beete has 19% less sugar (10 g vs 12.4 g).
Ingredients
Rote Beete
Rote Bete, Wasser, Zucker, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Mindortonc halthar hic: siehe Deckel,
Rote Bete
Rote Bete, Branntweinessig, Wasser, Rübenzucker, Meersalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote Beete or Rote Bete?
Overall, Rote Beete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Beete has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Beete has less sugar: 10 g versus 12.4 g per 100 g.