Comparison
Rote Beete vs Rote Beete
Overall, Rote Beete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rote Beete | Rote Beete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8.2 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Beete has 21% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Rote Beete has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rote Beete has 18% less sugar (8.2 g vs 10 g).
- Rote Beete has 79% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Rote Beete has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rote Beete is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rote Beete
Rote Beete
Rote Beete
Rote Bete, Wasser, Zucker, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Mindortonc halthar hic: siehe Deckel,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote Beete or Rote Beete?
Overall, Rote Beete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Beete has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Beete has less sugar: 8.2 g versus 10 g per 100 g.