Comparison
Rosemary Marcona Almonds vs Almonds
Overall, Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rosemary Marcona Almonds | Almonds |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 600 kcal |
| Fat | 50 g | 53.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 13.3 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosemary Marcona Almonds has 25% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.4 g).
- Rosemary Marcona Almonds has 25% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4.4 g).
- Almonds has 37% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Almonds has 25% more fiber (13.3 g vs 10 g).
- Almonds has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rosemary Marcona Almonds
Almonds, sunflower oil, sea salt, dried whole rosemary.
Almonds
Dry roasted almonds and sea salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosemary Marcona Almonds or Almonds?
Overall, Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosemary Marcona Almonds has fewer calories: 567 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosemary Marcona Almonds has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.